Bulk domain name checker for agencies and brand teams
Check five hundred candidates in one run, with the answer stamped on every row. The strategist keeps the judgement call. What goes away is the afternoon somebody spends pasting names into a registrar one at a time.
Sales replies by email, usually within one working day.
| Per run | Up to 500 names, one live lookup each |
| Input | A list you already have, or names generated from a brief |
| Output | Verdict and check time per row, exportable |
| Extensions | .com .io .co .net |
| Seats | Three on Studio, ten on Brokerage, sized on Enterprise |
| Access | SSO, SCIM, roles and an audit log on Enterprise |
Bulk checking sits on Studio and above. Everything in the access row is part of the Enterprise plan.
The alternative is a five figure engagement.
And it still hands back a list that somebody has to check by hand before anyone can act on it.
| The job | A naming engagement | NameBest |
|---|---|---|
| Producing a shortlist of 40 candidates | Two to six weeks, as a project | One afternoon, from a brief |
| Checking every candidate is registrable | Manual, one name at a time, often skipped | Built into generation, every row |
| Re-checking before the presentation | Manual again, because availability moved | One bulk run, timestamped per row |
| A name dying in the review meeting | The familiar failure: the client checks on a phone | Every name in the deck was checked |
| Deciding which name is right | The strategist, which is the part worth paying for | Still the strategist. We do not judge names |
| Typical cost | A naming engagement runs $5,000 to $50,000 | A plan, from $39 a month |
The expensive failure is not the fee. It is discovering after sign off that the .com is gone, and paying for the rebrand that follows.
What procurement and IT will ask for
All of it is part of the Enterprise plan. None of it is a roadmap item, and where something is bounded we say what the bound is.
Access
| Single sign on | SAML 2.0 against your identity provider |
| Provisioning | SCIM, so leavers lose access with the rest of their tools |
| Roles | Owner, editor and viewer, per workspace |
| Audit log | Who generated, exported and deleted what, with timestamps |
Commercial
| Service level | 99.9% uptime commitment |
| Billing | Invoicing and purchase orders, annually |
| Agreement | DPA, and a security review before you sign |
| Contact | A named point of contact and a naming strategist |
A naming brief is a product nobody has announced yet
Which is why the handling of it is written down here rather than left to a trust page nobody links to.
In transit and at rest
TLS on everything, including the registry lookups. Briefs and shortlists are stored in one database in one region and are not copied into analytics tools.
Your briefs are not training data
A naming brief describes a product nobody has announced yet. It is not used to train anything, it is not resold, and it cannot surface in another customer's shortlist.
Retention and deletion
Delete a brief or a workspace and it goes, along with its shortlists, within the retention window written into the agreement. Deletion on request is a contractual commitment, not a support gesture.
What we do not collect
No third party session recording, no advertising pixels on the product surface, and no personal data in a shortlist beyond the account that made it.
What teams ask before procurement gets involved
Anything not answered here goes to [email protected] and comes back from a person.
Five hundred per run on Studio and above, and the Enterprise plan lifts that to whatever your workflow needs. Each row is a real registry query, which is why the number is a limit rather than a marketing figure.
Yes. Paste or upload the list and the run returns a verdict and a timestamp per row. Most agency use starts this way, with the candidates a workshop already produced.
Yes to both on the Enterprise plan, and the review happens before you sign rather than after. Talk to sales and we will send the current documents.
Studio includes three seats and shared shortlists, Brokerage ten, and Enterprise is sized to the team. Shared briefs are the point: naming arguments that happen in one place are shorter than naming arguments that happen in four inboxes.
No. The judgement call stays with your strategist, which is the part clients are paying for. What we remove is the checking, which is the part nobody should be paying a strategist to do.
Before you talk to us
Three pages worth reading first, because they answer most of what a first call would cover.
What a bulk run actually asks, who answers it, and why a failed check is shown as a failed check.
Where bulk checking starts, what a seat costs, and what Enterprise adds on top.
The full list, including brandability scoring and the client-ready shortlist export.
Send one brief and see what a clean shortlist looks like.
Start on a plan today, or write to sales and we will walk a naming project through with you before anybody signs anything.
Sales replies by email, usually within one working day.